Two things about me: I have always loved data, and I have always been an over-intellectualizer, so years ago, after a particularly rattling breakup, I sat myself down to meticulously pick through my personal dating history to understand exactly where I had gone awry. With careful inspection, I realized that while I didn’t have a consistent “type” when it came to physicalities or even demographics, there was a pretty steady line threading through my dating career.
If I had to name my emotional pattern in relationships, it would be this: I was mistaking emotional inconsistency for excitement and depth. That confusion triggered my old performance of proving my worth to keep the peace and remain lovable. Pair that with the fact that I was big on feeling “the spark,” which for me showed up as a full-body somatic experience that often left me jittery and without an appetite. Together, these patterns kept me in a loop of over-functioning, trying to keep them happy, and reenacting the early-learned belief that being impressive yet agreeable made me worthy of love.
But the blame wasn’t entirely on my lack of discernment or their lack of compassion; that would simply be too simple. I came to realize it was being shaped by a deeper storyline I had been carrying for a long time.
So, in my very best Carrie Bradshaw voice, I asked myself: Are we ever dating people, or are we just dating our patterns?
If dating feels like Groundhog Day, or you keep ending up in the same dynamic no matter how different the relationship looks on the surface, you’re not alone. We often use these patterns as proof that there’s something fundamentally wrong with us. But in reality, they’re evidence of deeper storylines and emotional blueprints quietly running in the background of your relational life. And the good news is: they’re absolutely shiftable.
To begin shifting these patterns, we first have to understand where they came from, what purpose they serve, and why your body might be clinging to them even when they no longer serve you.
We don’t necessarily choose patterns consciously — we inherit them emotionally. While we might think that our nervous systems are constantly surveying our surroundings to find what’s good for us, they’re actually searching for what’s safe for us. And what feels safe is often what feels known to us. If you’ve ever said, “I just feel like I’ve known them forever,” (guilty) or felt a spark so strong it bordered on implosion, you may be conflating chemistry with your nervous system lighting up in response to what’s familiar, even if it’s dysfunctional.
Many of us learned to either perform or sacrifice to feel lovable. We weren’t taught to lead with our needs, trust our desires, or choose partners from a place of grounded self-worth. In childhood, we absorb messages about what love is, how we can earn it, and which parts of ourselves are digestible to love. You don't need to have experienced early childhood trauma to have a complex about your value and love – growing up in a merit-based society that’s obsessed with productivity, and associates your worth with output and accolades will do it. Over time, these early messages calcify into relational blueprints. They tell you what love should feel like, how hard you have to work for it, and which parts of you are too little or too much. We may find ourselves drawn to relationships that affirm these early lessons, even if they feel painful, inconsistent, or out of line with our current values.
However, it’s worth asking: Is this the kind of love I want, or just the one I know?
The fantasy is: maybe this time it’ll be different. Maybe this time I’ll be loved through it. Maybe this time I’ll be enough to change it. But by now, I’m sure you know what I’m going to say — we don’t heal the wound by repeating it. We heal it by breaking the pattern and starting anew.
So why do we keep returning to what hurt us? Because it’s familiar and because we’re grasping at a sense of control. Sometimes, predictability can feel safer than vulnerability or the fear of the unknown. We cling to old dynamics because they help us avoid deeper risks — of never finding love again, or being fully seen, of expressing our needs, and receiving love without needing to earn it. But reenactment doesn’t lead to healing — disruption does.
If we want a new outcome, we have to stop hoping the same story will end differently. We have to actively rewrite and choose differently.
Present-day me no longer subscribes to “the spark” as a tell-tale sign of compatibility. And after some trial and error of rebuilding the foundations of my relational patterns, I found my way to a relationship that values me for who I am, not what I bring to the table. What I realized in the process was that our patterns in dating are not our personal failures. They’re unconscious strategies, rooted in old methods of emotional survival.
Subscribe to be the first to read next week’s follow-up:
How to Break Your Dating Patterns and Choose Differently.